Improve Venture Capital Returns With IP Portfolio Management

For all the glamor and attract surrounding the Enterprise Capital business, one would count on the funding returns from VC funds to be considerably increased relative to different funding automobiles which might be extra broadly out there. Nonetheless, business analysis signifies that over time, enterprise capital returns have been roughly equal to the inventory market normally. Certainly, over half of all enterprise capital-backed firms fail and roughly the identical 50% of all cash invested in enterprise capital funds is misplaced. This text discusses how a complete IP administration technique might assist VC corporations decrease their threat and enhance the return of their respective funds.

In keeping with some conversations I’ve had with individuals within the VC business, the statistics above do not inform the total image. Along with half of the enterprise funded firms that fail, there are these which might be described because the “strolling useless” – firms that neither exit of enterprise, nor ever present the substantial returns wanted to fulfill typical VC fashions. One panelist I noticed at a enterprise convention final 12 months advised that for his or her monetary mannequin to make sense, they wanted at the least 1 out of 10 firms to supply a 20x return on their funding. This may very well be particularly troubling for the business, given the rising development in the direction of fewer and decrease valued liquidity occasions.

However what if a enterprise fund might extract incremental funding returns from their portfolio firms, together with the failed firms and from the so-called walking-dead firms? I imagine a complete cross-portfolio IP administration technique might present elevated returns to enterprise traders.

IP Due Diligence to Decrease Enterprise Threat

VC’s usually spend money on firms on the earliest phases of their respective life cycles. On the level of creating the funding determination, the enterprise capitalist is putting his or her guess on the enterprise thought, the administration workforce; and whether or not they comprehend it or not, they’re additionally putting a guess on the IP which underpins the enterprise.

It’s essential that VC corporations carry out correct and satisfactory due diligence in help of their funding choices. Sorry, however merely having a listing of patents and functions isn’t sufficient. Buyers want to know whether or not or not the patents are sturdy patents, with satisfactory protection for the enterprise and the expertise in query. The next quote sums it up higher than I can:

“Specifically, earlier than you spend money on a brand new enterprise thought for a brand new enterprise, why would not you wish to know whether or not you’ll be able to personal the enterprise thought in the long run or whether or not you’ve got minimal alternative to innovate freely in relation to that enterprise thought? Or, why would not you wish to know whether or not one other agency has invested $100K or extra in patent rights alone within the new enterprise thought that you’re investigating?” – from IP Property Maximizer.

These all-important questions must be answered throughout the investor’s due diligence. Be warned nonetheless, that topographical patent panorama maps or different summary visualizations don’t characterize a adequate degree of study. They could be an enchancment over a easy listing (though some would possibly argue that time), however a correct evaluation should contain an in depth examination of patent claims within the context of the enterprise and of the expertise in query.

IP Portfolio Administration to Decrease Prices & Improve Margins

Though a lot of the portfolio firms financed by a given enterprise fund might be comparatively small, and have a comparatively small portfolio of patents, it might be value it for the VC to look throughout all the IP portfolio in combination.

I did a fast evaluation of a pair regional VC corporations – with comparatively small portfolio’s of firms, these corporations had an invested curiosity in over 300 and 600 patents. By company requirements, these are sizeable portfolios. I’d anticipate finding even bigger portfolios with bigger enterprise corporations.

In companies with portfolios of this magnitude, it is very important perceive the portfolio in a number of dimensions. For instance, IP professionals, entrepreneurs and enterprise leaders wish to know what IP property help which merchandise. Data of those relationships can permit an organization to dam rivals, decrease prices, elevate margins and in the end enhance returns to traders. As well as, they’ll wish to categorize their patents by the markets and expertise areas they serve, because it helps them perceive if their patents align with the enterprise focus.

Bringing this self-discipline to IP Portfolio administration has the additional benefit of showing patents that aren’t core to the enterprise of the corporate. With this data in hand, a typical firm will search to decrease prices by letting patents expire, or they could search to promote or out-license their non-core patents, thus creating a brand new income.

IP Licensing to Improve Returns

Patents that aren’t core to the enterprise of the proudly owning firm should still be priceless to different firms and different industries. There are some well-known examples of firms who’ve been capable of generate vital revenues from their non-core patents by energetic licensing applications — Firms like IBM and Qualcomm come to thoughts. Nonetheless there are a selection of different firms which have generated vital returns by monetizing their non-core IP property.

Within the case of a VC portfolio of firms, every firm could solely have a small variety of non-core patents. However throughout the portfolio of firms, the enterprise agency could have rights to a big variety of patents that could be priceless to different firms/industries.

We are able to prolong the idea of monetizing non-core property of the highest firms within the enterprise portfolio to the “walking-dead” and even the defunct portfolio firms (though with these latter two teams, we could fear much less in regards to the distinction between core and non-core patents). In lots of circumstances, the enterprise mannequin and the due diligence supporting the unique funding in these have been most likely sound, however the enterprise failed because of execution or market timing points. In lots of circumstances the underlying IP property should still be absolutely legitimate, priceless and out there for entry right into a targeted licensing and monetization program.

A multi-million greenback licensing income stream would properly praise the periodic liquidity occasions in immediately’s VC market.

Source by Ron Carson